Finding a Mobile App Testing Company

-

Finding a Mobile App Testing Company



As the field of software engineering grows, new domains are explored. One of those domains is the mobile app testing domain. It is a hot area, and a lot of money has been invested in this particular domain for projects related to mobile apps. These topics include iPhone, BlackBerry, Android and Symbian applications.

The mobile app domain has been expanding for quite some time now. Ever since the mobile platform got some stability, people have been keen to use mobile applications, ranging from everyday apps to business/highly complicated applications. We see more and more projects being made just for the mobile apps domain, as the customer requirements continue to increase.

Naturally, when a business concern wants to choose a mobile app testing company there are many things to consider; for one, is the company repute good enough? or have they employed qualified software test engineers to complete the projects?

It is a very common concern that the testing companies do not employ enough qualified software testers for their work, which results in issues/delays, which is annoying and a business loss to the other party. Also it is something of a presumption that testing is somewhat of a non-technical or less important domain than software development or software project management. This assumption is totally wrong; as software testing is just as important as software development or software project management, and in fact a software tester often has better domain knowledge than a software developer or even the project manager. Domain is something a business analyst is supposed to be experts with, and the software tester comes after that in terms of understanding of business rules/business flow. It is important and vital to put software testing as a priority when it comes to hiring good and competent staff.

When a business party has to make a choice in choosing a mobile app testing company, be it Android-based apps, iPhone apps, Symbian apps or BlackBerry apps, the first thing is to make sure is that a third party has been chosen for app testing. If the party can hire staff on their own and train them in mobile app testing that would be more cost-effective for them. Also, it would save them the overhead of communications. If it is not feasible or possible either due to time limitation or technical knowledge, then there has to be a choice made to choose an app testing company.

Many business parties rely on personal contacts, as it is safer to trust a party which is referred by a trustworthy person. Indeed, that would be safer and logical. Also, if the party can ensure good communication, they can have the project outsourced and done by a virtual team, that is less costly in terms of budget, though the communication can be rather tricky at times. It is a choice which the business party has to make, and the best approach will be to use personal contacts as it is more reliable. Also, to prefer mobile app testing companies which have ISTQB or ISEB certified software test engineers.


Author: James S Clark
Source: Link

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is LCSAJ Testing?

-
Image
LCSAJ testing requires a model of the source code which identifies control flow jumps (where control flow does not pass to a sequential statement). An LCSAJ (Linear Code Sequence and Jump) is defined by a triple, conventionally identified by line numbers in a source code listing: the start of the linear code sequence, the end of the linear code sequence, and the target line to which control flow is transferred. Test cases shall be designed to exercise LCSAJs. For each test case, the following shall be specified: - the input(s) to the component; - identification of the LCSAJ(s) to be executed by the test case; - the expected outcome of the test case.
Read more

What is Syntax Testing?

-
Image
Syntax Testing uses a model of the formally-defined syntax of the inputs to a component. The syntax is represented as a number of rules each of which defines the possible means of production of a symbol in terms of sequences of, iterations of, or selections between other symbols. Test cases with valid and invalid syntax are designed from the formally defined syntax of the inputs to the component. Test cases with valid syntax shall be designed to execute options which are derived from rules which shall include those that follow, although additional rules may also be applied where appropriate: -   whenever a selection is used, an option is derived for each alternative by replacing the selection with that alternative; -   whenever an iteration is used, at least two options are derived, one with the minimum number of iterated symbols and the other with more than the minimum number of repetitions.   A test case may exercise any number of options.   For each test case the
Read more

ISTQB Dumps, Exam Paper 12: ISEB ISTQB Foundation Software Testing

-
Image
1. Which of the following statements contains the correct use of the terminology? a) a fault by a person may introduce an error into the software that may cause a failure in operation b) a failure by a person may introduce a fault into the software that may cause an error in operation c) an error made by a person may introduce a fault into the software that may cause a failure in operation d) an error made by a person may introduce a failure into the software that may cause a fault in operation e) a failure by a person may cause an error in the software that may cause a fault in operation 2.   A reliable system will be one that: a) is unlikely to be completed on schedule b) is unlikely to cause a failure c) is likely to be fault-free d) is likely to be liked by the users e) includes a minimum number of components 3.   Which of the following statements about ‘Integration Testing in the Small’ is false? a) It can combine all the components together in one go
Read more